UPDATE | John Dellick in jail; linked to report of gun found at hotel
YOUNGSTOWN — John Dellick, 21, of Canfield, the son of Mahoning County Juvenile Court Judge Theresa Dellick, is back in jail.
John Dellick turned himself in Friday to members of the Adult Parole Authority at their offices on West Federal Street and was booked into the Mahoning County jail.
He is scheduled for a probable cause hearing Monday in common pleas court on allegations that he violated the terms of his probation stemming from his guilty plea last year on a count of aggravated assault in a 2014 case.
Parole agents would not comment on the circumstances of Dellick’s arrest, but a Boardman police report from Jan. 3 lists Dellick’s case when an officer was called to the Red Roof Inn on Tiffany Boulevard South because a guest left a handgun there.
According to the Boardman police report, a worker cleaning a room about 12:45 p.m. Jan. 3 found a loaded .25-caliber semiautomatic handgun. She handed it to management who, in turn, called police.
Reports said Dellick was the last person who rented the room, renting it on Jan. 2 and a witness in the report told the officer they saw Dellick check out at 12 p.m. Jan. 3, reports said.
Under the terms of Dellick’s probation for the case, he would not be allowed to own a gun or be near a firearm.
Dellick pleaded guilty Dec. 8, 2014 to a charge of aggravated assault, a fourth- degree felony, for an October 2013 road-rage incident in Canfield, and a misdemeanor charge of assault for a July 2013 incident in Canfield involving a friend at a Canfield plaza.
A grand jury indicted him on the charges early in 2014.
He was sentenced to 18 months probation in February 2015 by Visiting Judge Michael Nunner. The sentence was agreed upon by both defense counsel and prosecutors with the state Attorney General’s office, who handled the case.
In addition to probation, he also was sentenced to 160 hours of community service and given 30- and 25-day jail sentences, respectively, that were suspended with the understanding they could be imposed if he failed to follow the terms of his probation.
43
