First film in franchise drew mixed reviews
Associated Press
When George Lucas’ “Star Wars” first landed in 1977, some critics were swept away, while others resisted the tide. A sampling:
EXHAUSTING
“‘Star Wars’ is like getting a box of Cracker Jacks which is all prizes. This is the writer-director George Lucas’ own film, subject to no business interference, yet it’s a film that’s totally uninterested in anything that doesn’t connect with the mass audience. There’s no breather in the picture, no lyricism; the only attempt at beauty is in the double sunset. It’s enjoyable on its own terms, but it’s exhausting, too: like taking a pack of kids to the circus. ... It’s an epic without a dream.”
Pauline Kael, The New Yorker
THUMBS UP
“‘Star Wars’ taps the pulp fantasies buried in our memories, and because it’s done so brilliantly, it reactivates old thrills, fears and exhilarations we thought we’d abandoned when we read our last copy of Amazing Stories.”
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times.
OVERWHELMING BANALITY
“Strip ‘Star Wars’ of its often striking images and its high-falutin scientific jargon, and you get a story, characters and dialogue of overwhelming banality, without even a “future” cast to them. Human beings, anthropoids or robots, you could probably find them all, more or less like, that, in downtown Los Angeles today. ... O dull new world!”
John Simon, New York magazine
WITTY
“‘Star Wars’ ... is the most elaborate, most expensive, most beautiful movie serial ever made. It’s both an apotheosis of ‘Flash Gordon’ serials and a witty critique that makes associations with a variety of literature that is nothing if not eclectic: ‘Quo Vadis?’ ‘Buck Rogers,’ ‘Ivanhoe,’ ‘Superman,’ ‘The Wizard of Oz,’ ‘The Gospel According to St. Matthew,’ the legend of King Arthur and the knights of the Round Table.
Vincent Camby, New York Times
RIP-ROARING GALLOP
“‘Star Wars’ is Buck Rogers with a doctoral degree but not a trace of neuroticism or cynicism, a slam-bang, rip-roaring gallop through a distantly future world full of exotic vocabularies, creatures and customs, existing cheek by cowl with the boy and girl next door and a couple of friendly leftovers from the planet of the apes and possibly one from Oz.
Charles Champlin, Los Angeles Times