Path to success today

Opinion: July 30, 2012 at 12:00a.m.

By Victor Dorff

Los Angeles Times

Cheating was, is and probably always will be a fact of life. Recently, technology has provided new ways to cheat, but advanced electronics can’t be blamed for our increasing willingness to tolerate it.

Once upon a time, being an honorable person included the notion that your word was your bond, and integrity was a crucial element in establishing a good reputation. At least, that was part of the narrative that made up our social compact. My teaching experience tells me, however, that lying and cheating are seen by a lot of kids today as a crucial part of any path to success. The only shame is in getting caught.

Students tell me that math is the easiest course in which to cheat because they can program calculators before a test and cheat undetected. An English teacher told me she no longer counts her vocabulary quizzes in her students’ grades because she hasn’t found a way to stop them from copying the answers. And our school’s not-uncommon policy is basically to forgive a first offense and to enter it into the permanent record only if the student is caught again.

Cheating

Compounding the problem is the fact that many students aren’t fully aware of what constitutes cheating. While teaching at a university a few years ago, I was surprised when a student I had accused of plagiarizing by cutting and pasting text from a website denied having cheated. He indignantly argued that he would never cut and paste — he had retyped the entire thing.

A few weeks ago, a student took my final exam in the morning and gave the answers to someone who was taking it that afternoon. The second student didn’t notice that the question on his test was slightly different, and the answer was now wrong. When confronted, he professed not to understand that he had cheated. He thought that getting a test answer from another student in advance was no different than studying with a partner. A few days later, when his mother came in to find out why her son had failed, she too said she couldn’t understand the difference.

In a survey of students last month, I asked what they thought of the idea of requiring next semester’s students to sign a pledge that said, simply, “I will not lie, cheat or steal.” Most thought it was a great idea, but they didn’t think the pledge would change anything.

Penalties

As for the proposed penalties, they thought that giving an F on an assignment was OK, giving an F on the report card was acceptable but harsh and that putting the names of the cheaters on a public “wall of shame” would be going too far.

That implies that students put a value on their public reputation, so a wall of shame might be an effective threat. But the idea didn’t fly any better with my colleagues than it did with my students. One compared it to cutting off the hands of a thief as a deterrent to crime. Another said it would be like taking the offending students outside and having the class throw things at them. Instead of focusing on the penalty for cheating, she said, we should be addressing the pressures that make students feel they need to cheat to succeed.

Cheating needs to be addressed as part of a cultural problem. It is up to us to make it unacceptable throughout society. Every time we accept it as unavoidable or tolerable, we help ensure that the culture of cheating is passed on to the next generation.

Victor Dorff, a former attorney and journalist, teaches math at Palisades Charter High School in California. He wrote this for the Los Angeles Times. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.