What to make of Iowa

Opinion: August 22, 2011 at 12:00a.m.

Los Angeles Times: Say what you will about the Iowa straw poll — and we could say plenty, including that it’s the political equivalent of Groundhog Day, that its results don’t predict outcomes in the state’s winter caucus because its participants are an unrepresentative sample of voters, and that it’s a cynical way for Iowa’s Republican Party to raise money — but you can’t say it’s insignificant. Just ask Tim Pawlenty.

The former governor of Minnesota dropped out of the GOP nomination race after a disappointing third-place finish in Ames, behind Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann and Texas Rep. Ron Paul. It was probably the right decision for Pawlenty, given that his fading campaign had pinned its hopes on a strong showing.

Iowa’s poll may not say much about which GOP hopeful will eventually come out on top (held since 1979, the poll has a history of picking losers such as Pat Robertson in 1987 and Mitt Romney in 2007), but it does indicate something about the kind of candidate social conservatives will be backing.

Pawlenty’s shellacking by Bachmann, who won 28.6 percent of the votes to his 13.6 percent, came despite Pawlenty’s fervent courting of the religious voters who make up the conservative core of Iowa Republicans. The main difference between the two, and the one that Pawlenty frequently emphasized, was that as a state governor from 2003 to 2011, he was the candidate with experience and a record of accomplishment.

Poll participants didn’t care — any more than voters nationwide cared in 2008, when they elected a relatively inexperienced but eloquent senator from Illinois as president.