Openness remains elusive goal for Obama

By PETER NICHOLAS

WASHINGTON — One casualty of President Barack Obama’s first year in office is a notion that was central to his election victory: that he would transform a political system mired in gridlock and secrecy, opening the doors on the legislative process.

That hasn’t happened. Instead of health care negotiations broadcast on C-SPAN, as candidate Obama famously promised, the fate of the landmark bill is being hashed out in private on Capitol Hill. And recent polls indicate that the public has lowered its expectations about the prospect of a more open government.

In his State of the Union speech Wednesday, Obama signaled he isn’t giving up on the idea that he can usher in greater accountability and transparency in Washington. But realities of governing have caused him to trim his ambitions.

In recent days, Obama made a surprising admission: the health care negotiations have fallen short of his standard for openness. He told ABC’s Diane Sawyer that health care was an “ugly process and it looks like there are a bunch of backroom deals.”

He said he wanted to “move forward in a way that recaptures that sense of opening things up more.”

Up to that point, the administration’s position had been that the public was sufficiently informed about health care, even though negotiations with doctors, drug manufacturers and other interest groups took place in private, often at the White House.

“The president feels very comfortable with the amount of transparency that we’ve had,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in July.

But it isn’t clear what Obama plans to do to open things up.

The question came up again Friday, when Obama spoke to the Republican House caucus in Baltimore.

U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told the president that because of the failure to broadcast the talks, “I was disappointed and I think a lot of Americans were disappointed.”

Obama replied that C-SPAN had aired the “majority” of the proceedings through its coverage of committee hearings. The president conceded, though, that health care was a “messy process ... so on that one, I take responsibility.”

It might have been a promise Obama was unwise to make in the first place. Even advocates for open government say it’s unrealistic to expect all government business to play out publicly.

Ellen Miller, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, a nonpartisan group that pushes for more openness in government, said: “You can’t have every negotiation, every discussion, be on camera if you expect productive results. The legislative process is one of horse trading and compromises. If you put that all on camera all the time, nothing would get done.”

Obama’s pledge to pry loose government information and share it with the public is showing mixed results on other fronts. Government watchdog groups credit Obama for releasing names of visitors to the White House complex, including the release Friday of 75,000 records of visits in October.

“What they’re doing is wiring openness as the default position in government,” Miller said. “Hopefully, the genie of openness will never be put back into the bottle again.”