Obama weighs increase in forces

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is weighing an expected request for more U.S. troops against concerns that an expanded American presence could be perceived by Afghan civilians as an occupation army and not a liberating force battling a determined and bloody Taliban resurgence.

As the president took a newly finished review of military strategy in Afghanistan with him to Camp David on Wednesday as he continues a vacation break, a senior administration official declined to say how Obama is leaning on whether to boost American forces above the troops he ordered deployed earlier this year.

But by acknowledging concern that Afghans — and Americans and NATO allies — may see any significant U.S. troop increase as a shift from liberation to occupation, the White House could be opening a policy escape hatch — a pared-down request from the military that Obama would find agreeable.

The troop recommendations are expected to come in the next several weeks, after a wide-ranging review of the war and civilian efforts that arrived Monday from Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

The senior White House official, speaking anonymously to detail Obama’s thinking, said the concern about how Afghans, Americans and NATO allies would view a troop increase was part of five broad measurements the president was applying to the assessment and an expected request for more troops. The other concerns, the official said, are:

UHow force size changes might be countered by al-Qaida propaganda and tactics.

UWhat impact any change would have on neighboring, nuclear-armed Pakistan, where the al-Qaida leadership — including Osama bin Laden — are believed hiding along the rugged, mountainous border.

UThe effect on the “health” of U.S. forces, already strained from repeated deployments in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

UHow more forces effectively would propel Obama’s goal of denying al-Qaida and its Taliban allies safe havens in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

By the end of the process, the overall request for additional forces could be relatively small — perhaps below a standing request for 10,000 additional troops that McChrystal’s predecessor left behind. McChrystal will also recommend shifting forces within the country, rearranging the current mix of forces and contracting out some tasks now performed by soldiers, military officials said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has already laid some of the groundwork against a major expansion of the U.S. force. Speaking in Texas on Monday about the McChrystal assessment, Gates said: “We have been very explicit that Gen. McChrystal should be forthright in telling us what he needs.”

But Gates added, “I think there are larger issues. We will have to look at the availability of forces; we will have to look at costs. There are a lot of different things we will have to look at.”