Experts: Rising gas prices could have lasting impact


There’s been a change in the way Americans commute.

McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — America’s days as an automobile nation are far from over. But the specter of high gas prices becoming permanent has forced the nation to reassess its “Yeah, right” attitude toward public transportation and to reconsider how Americans get from point A to point B.

In the 1970s, when gas station lines snaked around the corner and gas guzzlers ruled Detroit, Asian automakers flooded the U.S. with smaller, fuel-efficient models.

Casual observers see a simple case of history repeating itself. But transportation experts say that the current gasoline crisis, which is driven by price, is far different from those of the ’70s, which were crises of availability. In fact, many think that today’s soaring gas prices will have a more lasting impact on what we drive, how we drive and our collective attitude toward investment in mass transit.

At the current rate, the average two-car family could end up spending nearly $7,000 a year to gas up its vehicles, said Stephen Reich, the director of the Center for Urban Transportation Research at the University of South Florida. “That’s unsustainable. At some point the math begins to not work,” Reich said.

Evidence already is mounting of a wholesale change in the way Americans commute. Motorists have driven roughly 30 billion fewer miles over the past six months compared with the same period a year ago, according to federal government estimates. Meanwhile, commuters took 10.3 billion trips on public transportation last year, the most in 50 years according to the American Public Transportation Association. Ridership is up 3.3 percent in the first three months of 2008 and 30 percent since 1995.

Both trends suggest that growing numbers of Americans are reaching their tipping points in how much they’ll spend for the freedom and luxury of personal automobile transportation.

Reich and noted transportation consultant Alan Pisarski share a reluctance to declare America in the early stages of a commuter revolution. When looking at modes of travel, scale is important, Pisarski said. Mass transit accounts for only 1 percent of U.S. travel.

In addition, the recent decline in automobile travel isn’t the result of people leaving their cars for public transportation. People are simply deferring trips, shortening them and driving less because of the cost.

The economic slowdown also plays a part, Pisarski said. Fewer people with jobs means fewer people driving to work and less economic activity, which results in less vehicle travel, particularly among trucks as fewer goods are purchased and shipped. Recreational travel takes a hit as well, as fewer people drive to the movies, malls and for vacations.

However, the House of Representatives recently passed a bill that would authorize nearly $2 billion worth of investments in public transportation systems. The extra money would help keep fares down and expand service.

In recent years, more cities have embraced public transit funding as urban sprawl drives traffic congestion and rising energy costs put a damper on home values in suburban and exurban areas.

After voters approved a 20-year transit sales tax in 2000, a 20-mile stretch of light rail linking Phoenix, Tempe and Mesa, Ariz., will begin service later this year. In 2004, Phoenix-area voters approved another transportation sales tax to improve highways and add 37 more miles to the light rail system.

If nothing else, the psychological effect of rising gas prices will make the public more willing to embrace mass-transit funding in the future, Pisarski said.