HOMELAND SECURITY Terrorism experts fear unfriendly skies

Weapons and explosives still make it past screeners.
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
NEW YORK -- Security experts continue to be concerned that terrorists are monitoring and probing the nation's aviation system to uncover vulnerabilities and prepare for another attack.
As often as twice a week, major airlines receive reports of suspicious behavior, according to industry sources -- such things as passengers videotaping the cockpit area, spending excessive amounts of time in the lavatory, or suddenly rushing to the front of the plane and then backing off.
Despite rising concern about security, however, pilots and other industry sources say there is still no single and standardized system for airline employees to report such suspicious behavior directly to government investigators.
Reports go to airlines
Although the Federal Air Marshal Service does have a secure Web site to report such things, many airlines require that reports go to them first for vetting before they're sent along.
In addition, industry insiders say that flight crews need more training to alert them how to identify the difference between unusual but innocent behavior and "operational surveillance."
Such training and awareness could give security agencies and flight crews the intelligence they need to thwart another attack. Indeed, the Al-Qaida terrorists who commandeered four planes 9/11 spent more than a year analyzing how the airlines and their security apparatus operated. Several took what were believed to be "casing" flights in the summer of 2001.
"The flight crew should be the eyes and ears of aviation security," said Chris Witkowski, director of air safety, health, and security for the Association of Flight Attendants. "They need training."
Other weak spots
These concerns are the latest in a series of vulnerabilities uncovered within the nation's aviation security system. An inspector general's report recently found that undercover investigators in the past year were still able to get weapons and explosives past government screeners.
Another report found that three years after Sept. 11, no centralized watch list contains the names of all suspected terrorists. Two of the Sept. 11 hijackers were known to the U.S. government at the time, but they were not on its no-fly list.
More work
The Transportation Security Agency acknowledges that more work needs to be done to secure the nation's skies, but said it has made great strides. The key, it insists, is focusing on a multilayered approach, including improving passenger screening, securing cockpit doors and training pilots to use firearms. Its investigators are also confident that they are getting full cooperation from the airlines in terms of reporting any suspicious behavior.
"We have an excellent working relationship with the industry," said Dave Adams, a spokesman for the Federal Air Marshal Service. "There is a clear line of communication, and we are getting the information."
But sources familiar with the current system contend that it has at times prevented such reports from making it to federal security authorities. That's because of the requirement by many airlines that security concerns go to them first.
"The carriers would like information to go through them for obvious reasons," said Capt. Steve Luckey, chairman of the National Security Committee of the Air Line Pilots Association. "But unfortunately we have tracked some things we thought were significant issues that went into the corporate structure that didn't come out."
Connecting the dots
Security experts say that's a prescription for trouble. An odd incident at one airline may not raise concerns for its security professionals because it may be perceived as an isolated incident. If they were aware that it was also happening at other airlines, it could become more critical.
"There are potential dots here, and someone should connect them," said Brian Jenkins, a security analyst at the RAND Corp. in Santa Monica, Calif. "Anomalies may have no meaning, but anomalies in a sequence of events may."
For security reasons, the nation's leading air carriers refuse to talk about their reporting process. But an internal United Airlines employee bulletin dated July 19, 2004, gives some insight into its procedures.
The memo notes that some federal air marshals (FAMs) are instructing flight attendants to report "suspicious or irregular incidents to a [Federal Air Marshal] Web site." But it said that "Our flight attendants must follow UAL procedures to report safety/security issues or unusual situations." Those procedures require that incidents be reported to the company.
Jeff Green of United Airlines confirmed that the company's operating procedures do require employees to report security concerns to United, but he wouldn't comment on whether all such incidents are passed on to federal authorities. He did note, however that "our No. 1 priority is the safety and security of our passengers and our crew."
But an internal union security document from one of the major airlines criticizes its reporting procedures, noting that it "does not have a stand alone system for collecting and analyzing security incidents reported by air crews."
Successful precedent
Pilots say there's a successful precedent at the airlines to help them deal with such security issues. It's how they've handled safety concerns -- those potential malfunctions that may involve human or mechanical error.
"What United has done with aviation safety awareness is phenomenal in terms of collecting safety data and disseminating it to air crews so that we all can learn from the experience of others," said one pilot, who asked not to be identified. "I'd love to see this same protocol applied to security."