SUPREME COURT RULING Libraries forced to spend more on Web protection

Filtering software must be installed for state funding to continue.
By MATT BIXENSTINE
VINDICATOR STAFF WRITER
YOUNGSTOWN -- Last month's U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding Internet filtering has left some local public libraries in need of funds while others continue to weigh options.
The June 23 decision will require libraries wishing to receive federal funding, known as e-rate money, to install filtering devices on all their computers -- including those for adult and library staff Internet use -- to block access to obscene and pornographic material.
While Warren-Trumbull County and New Castle public libraries already have filtering software installed on Internet-accessible computers in their children's sections, many area libraries will have to scramble if they wish to comply with the high court's decision to uphold the Children's Internet Protection Act.
"Money is very tight right now so setting aside money for [filtering] software would be difficult," said Ruth Mizik, Hubbard Public Library director. "We would probably have to take money from other areas -- my guess from other library materials like books and magazines."
Prices for installing Internet filtering software vary significantly, but some installations can cost thousands of dollars.
Other libraries are considering their options as they await clarification from the Federal Communications Commission as to when the law becomes effective and whom will be affected. Under Supreme Court rules, the ruling can take effect no earlier than July 18.
The Public Library of Youngstown and Mahoning County does not have filtering software but does receive about $50,000 to 60,000 in e-rate money annually.
"The implication of this ruling for us is to continue to receive federal funding. We would have to install filters," said Carlton A. Sears, library director.
State funding
The Ohio Legislature voted in June to keep the Library and Local Government Support Fund relatively stable. Next year's Pennsylvania state budget, however, includes a 50 percent cut for public libraries, making it increasingly difficult for these libraries to implement new services like filtering software.
"We are not greedy," said Karen Spak, Shenango Valley Community Library director. "We understand that times are tough and are willing to share the burden. But we don't want to be cut disproportionately -- and I think we see this in the state of Pennsylvania."
Spak said statistics show library usage actually increases during uncertain economic times because people cannot afford to buy their own books.
Many local libraries without filtering software impose strict policies to prevent Internet use by children without parent or guardian supervision. Some have users sign an agreement pledging to use the service appropriately before accessing the Internet.
Not full-proof
Mizik said filtering software is far from full-proof and often blocks useful information.
"Parents and guardians get a false sense of security," she said. "No filter software today is 100 percent reliable."
Susan Walls, New Castle Public Library director, said her library manages its filtering software by having a team of librarians adept at separating "good from bad information."
Libraries that do not receive federal funding, such as Salem Public Library, will likely not be affected by the ruling.
"Our board is fully supportive of intellectual freedom and has no restrictions on [Internet] access," said George W.S. Hays, Salem Public Library director/clerk-treasurer. "At this point we have no restrictions, and I don't anticipate any in the future."
mbixenstine@vindy.com