Laws on books already cover animal proposal in Niles

Laws on books already cover animal proposal in Niles
EDITOR:
I am writing this letter in response to the proposed animal-limit law in Niles. How thoughtful of Mr. Papalas to allow the citizens of Niles one year to comply with his proposed legislation.
Until I read his proposal, I, like most Americans, assumed Hitler and his regime were dead. If his proposal passes, maybe he can go to the homes of his constituents and help them decide which of their dogs (family members) to kill. I'm sure everyone would be interested in his selection process.
Obviously, Mr. Papalas is not aware of the animal shelter overpopulation crisis, and, frankly, I'm appalled that he would even suggest to families that they get rid of their pets. One can only assume he was not elected to office based on his family values platform.
Finally, Mr. Papalas should spend some time educating himself to the laws of our state, as laws already exist addressing the problems he claims are plaguing the city of Niles. Sorry, Mr. Papalas, but I don't think the citizens of Niles should have to kill their dogs because you and your fellow government officials are too lazy to enforce the laws already in existence.
VIRGINIA TACSIK
Canfield
Reviewer missed a chanceto encourage young people
EDITOR:
On Aug. 10, a Vindicator staff writer wrote a review of Stage Left Players' performance of "Macbeth." The reviewer states, "The performance of the tragedy seldom rose above the adequate level." May I suggest that the review itself never rose above the level of irresponsible.
First of all, it seems obvious to me that the reviewer has no appreciation of the appropriateness of this play to modern society. Secondly, based upon his remarks concerning individual performances, I doubt very much whether he attended the entire production. Finally, and most importantly, this particular reviewer missed a golden opportunity to encourage five very young actors who are just beginning their appreciation for the arts.
Yes, it may be true that the overall performance needed a boost of energy, and believe me, it got just that the second weekend. The important point here, however, is that in a time when our society seems somewhat overanxious by our state of world affairs, we must as responsible adults do what we can to encourage our young people to seek pride, self-respect and an appreciation for accomplishment. Too many times, and I include myself, we remain critical and nonsupportive of their efforts.
I am not a reviewer. I do believe it is necessary to inspire better performance through constructive opinion, not criticism. The five very young cast members most likely did need to stand up straighter and project their lines farther into the audience.
The fact is, however, that this is not Hollywood nor New York City. May I suggest that this reviewer might have first congratulated and recognized the very young actors just for attempting these difficult roles. Only after that should he have suggested possible ways to improve their performances. When we adults deal with the very young in a learning situation, I believe the order should be encouragement, followed by suggesting ways of improvement, followed by showing those ways of improvement, and finally encouraging them again.
I want to let Nathan Price, Andrew Robb, J.P. Gallo, and Joseph and Joshua Lankford know how very proud of them I am. I hope all five will continue their pursuits of the arts. Lastly, I want Eric Kibler (Macbeth) and Kathy Fawcett (Lady Macbeth) to know that I was and will always be honored to be on the same stage.
ROLLIN MICHAEL
Austintown
XThe writer is a member of the Victorian Players of Youngstown and Stage Left Players of Lisbon/Salem. His portrayal of Macduff was described as "fairly solid" in the review in question.