Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Is Iran about to change? Is there a chance that the conflict with the West over Iran’s nuclear program will now end?
The June 14 presidential election resulted in victory for Hasan Rowhani, a man many are labeling a “moderate” and even a “reformer.” Rowhani, a Shiite cleric, has made mostly conciliatory statements since becoming president-elect.
Undoubtedly, Rowhani can be labeled a moderate only by the standards of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He is a cleric who has been a regime insider, a member of the “Expediency Council” and has very close relations with the most conservative among the regime powerful, including the Supreme Leader.
Still, he was clearly the most moderate among the choices the voters faced, and his selection is important.But it remains to be seen what exactly it portends.
It’s important to remember that Iran is not a true democracy. Voters selected from among a small handful of men approved by the unelected Guardian Council. Further, the president, who nevertheless does have some democratic legitimacy, is not the most powerful man in the country. It is the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has final say on all matters.
What’s truly fascinating about the election is that Rowhani, who pledges to improve relations with the West, is becoming president because the supreme leader has decided to allow it. The big question is why Khamenei permitted Rowhani to win.
The last time Iranian voters tried to bring change to their country, back in 2009, the supreme leader made sure his preferred candidate emerged victorious. The result was the re-election of now-outgoing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad amid massive protests accusing the government of fraud.
This time, the majority of Iranians who want change managed to elect the most moderate candidate from among their limited choices.
The most promising possibility of what happened is Rowhani won because Khamenei is ready for change.
TROUBLED YEARS FOR IRAN
The last few years have been extremely difficult for Iran. The social protests created bitterness and division and frayed the fabric of society. Iran’s continuing nuclear enrichment in defiance of its international commitments brought on costly economic sanctions. Sanctions have hit the economy hard, adding to social strife. Ahmadinejad’s abrasive style, his Holocaust denial and taunting of the international community have added to international isolation and mistrust.
One possibility is that Khamenei has decided the nuclear program has gone far enough and has opted to allow a man with a more conciliatory tone to become the face of Iran as it unwinds its enmity with the rest of the world and eases ties with critics at home.
A second possibility is that the relatively moderate forces inside Iran outmaneuvered the supreme leader. There were two moderate candidates, Rowhani and Mohammed Reza Aref. Aref pulled out just days before the election, allowing moderates to unify behind a single candidate. It is also true that Rowhani’s “reformist” platform only became evident late into the campaign. Maybe Khamenei discovered Rowhani’s leanings too late to stop him. After the 2009 experience maybe he didn’t want to risk another uprising.
If that is the case, Khamenei will not allow Rowhani to go too far easing social rules and foreign policy.
A third possibility is that Khamenei chose Rowhani to soften the regime’s image without making any changes to the country’s policies. If that is the case, it is possible that the regime plans to continue pushing ahead, as it has done for a decade, making progress toward a nuclear weapon, while creating the illusion that it is becoming much more moderate to fool the West into relaxing sanctions and lowering its guard.
Any of these scenarios is possible. President Barack Obama is right to say he will not lift any sanctions unless he sees concrete evidence of change.
It would be great news to the world if Iran is indeed becoming more moderate. But for now Rowhani says the nuclear program will continue. The centrifuges are still spinning. Tehran is still supporting Bashar Assad’s butchery in Syria, and political prisoners have not been released.
Let’s hope better, safer times are coming. But we still don’t know if anything is changing in Iran.
Frida Ghitis writes about global affairs for The Miami Herald. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
Copyright 2013 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.